Skip to main content

Screwing your Business Partner

The indecipherable expression on a young man's face as his business partner threatens to sue him for everything is definitely the best scene of Andrew Sorkin's The Social Network. Mark Zuckerberg just stares at his best friend Eduardo Saverin who is flipping out after being screwed out of their business.  Jesee Eisenberg potrays  Zuckenberg the youngest (self-made) billionaire in the world ($6.9B as at Oct 2010) who built facebook into a network of 500 million friends but lost his only friend along the way.



No, this is not a how-to get into your business partners pants post. Rather I want to talk about the little considered but very important relationship that you have with your business partner  and how to balance the pursuit of profit with keeping the friendship going. I cannot overstate the importance of maintaining a healthy friendly relationship with your business partner. As Eduardo found out, the minute the friendship starts deteriorating, so goes the business relationship.

Disagree in Black and White
When two entrepreneurs combine their creative forces, passion for business, and capital to launch a business you can expect fireworks. Most times these sparks work in the favour of the business and a great innovative business can result. However sometimes, a difference in opinion can lead to bitter disagreements that threaten to tear down the entire business. This is especially the case where the entrepreneurs are 'blessed' with sizeable egos.

Just like in medicine, prevention is usually better than cure; which means that you should probably pick a business partner with whom you already get along with. This is however no guarantee that disagreements will not crop up. How to handle these disagreements can determine whether your business fails or succeed.

One way I have found effective in handling disagreements is to reduce your disagreements into writing. Once you start writing you will be forced to introduce rationale and logic to state your case. You will also usually avoid the shouting and ad hominem that is so common with verbal arguments. Written arguments also serve as evidence of your position on the matter that can be referred to in future.

Who does what
Unless you have venture capital backing or lots of money to waste, the first employees in a startup are usually the owners. This creates unique challenges for business owners without any entrepreneurial experience or those that have come from an established office environment. The reality usually is that entrepreneurs have to be prepared to be the CEO and the janitor.

When a business has two or more owners who are expected to be working in the business, then it is critical that from the very beginning it is clearly spelled out who does what. Duties should be collectively agreed upon and should be assigned based on someone's existing strengths. If a business owner will not be able to contribute working in the business then this should be discussed early on and the appropriate financial implications (shares held, profit to be earned) revised accordingly.

The worst possible situation is when a business owner starts to resent their duties or his partners because he or she feels: a) overworked b) treated condescendingly/ like an employee by other partners  c) not useful / his or her efforts not contributing to the development of the business.

If your business is in this situation then you only have two options open to you. Either:

  1. Close down the business - feelings of resentment will inevitably destroy the business and you should just quit while you are still ahead.
  2. Less dramatically, you can start from square one - this means that you re-assign duties to be undertaken considering ability, skills, and share of business. As a transitory period a good way to appreciate each others' frustrations is to exchange roles, or literally step in each others' shoes. Think Wife Swap reality show - you should go the full length if possible and take over each others' telephones, apartments, email accounts etc. Within one week of this, any feelings of resentment will disappear as you will come to deeply understand each other.

Honesty is the really the Best Policy
When a partnership starts breaking down one of the signs is the concealment of information or untruthfulness. Lack of honesty breeds mistrust which is a death knell for a business partnership. Dishonesty that creeps up in the course of a business (as opposed to from the very beginning) usually has one of these two origins:

  1. The dishonest partner conceals information which might embarrass him or subject him to reproach by the other partners. This is more likely if previously disclosing such information led to negative criticism from the other partner/partners. To avoid this scenario, care must be taken to always balance criticism with viable solutions. The sandwich approach where you place the criticism inside a positive statement and a positive solution is very effective.
  2. The dishonest partner has personal financial problems and starts using the business fund to resolve these problems without consulting the other partners - the best safeguard to this is to have strict financial controls. Ensuring all receipts are deposited in a jointly controlled bank is a simple yet effective control.
Starting and running a business with a partner can be a rewarding and enjoyable experience. Partners lighten the heavy load of start up stress financially and mentally, temper risky endeavours, and can result in a great friendship. Work on these three things this year to avoid screwing your business partner

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Young Entrepreneur Who Refused to Look for a Job

A read I thought would be of interest: LITTLE might be known about Imran Khosla, but not so for those who frequent courts or those in the information and communication technology industry. His is a story of a young entrepreneur who has refused to sit and just wait for jobs to come but has decided with the little cash he has to start off his own business that is now giving birth to new ventures beyond what he had imagined. Now in his late twenties, Imran set up his first electronic shop which also sold computer accessories in 2008. “After hearing lots of stories about graduates who have had tormenting search for jobs to no avail, obviously that was not the route I wished to take. I wanted to create my own job, and be my own boss, this was the inspiration that threw me into the world of entrepreneurship, and four years on, I tell you all is well and you cannot believe it I have over ten employees, and whose turnover is running into fortunes now,” Imran says with a cheer. His journ...

Sine qua non

Reader’s discretion: Strong Language and Violence Paxa  Rainne slams her open palm on the car horn frustrated. Another matatu has overlapped and cut her off just as she was to join the highway. Driving into town from Ngara is still a nightmare, despite a spanking new superhighway. Rainne wonders if her naivety in being polite to other road users is a magnet for this menace. Rainne has been in traffic now for over an hour and has hardly moved ten metres, giving way to dozens of other vehicles but not getting any reciprocation. She wriggles her bare toes, driving shoeless in these conditions is more comfortable.  She takes comfort in that small luxury. The lotion she applied on her feet earlier is keeping them nice and cool. The conductor of the matatu swings wildly from the door as it narrowly misses Rainne’s front bumper. “Siste, huku ni Nairobi, jikakamue”! She glares at him and he returns a lewd look, seemingly excited at the fact that he’s unnerved ...

TO MENS REA OR NOT TO MENS REA

  Does excluding mens rea in the Statement of Offence make a charge defective? Rule of Law When a person is accused of an offence, his constitutional right to a fair hearing requires that he should be informed of the charge with sufficient detail to answer it [1] . In order for an accused person to be informed of the charge, first the charge is drawn up and secondly it is stated to him. Drawing the Charge A charge or information is drawn with sufficient detail to answer it if it contains:  a statement of the specific offence or offences with which the accused person is charged; and particulars necessary for giving reasonable information as to the nature of the offence charged [2] . The framing of a charge or information should follow the rules laid down in Section s137(a)(ii)the Criminal Procedure Code which provides: 137(a)(ii) the statement of offence shall describe the offence shortly in ordinary language, avoiding as far as possible the use of ...