Skip to main content

Consitutional Anatomy - 001- Kadhi's Courts

Jumping straight into the fray, I want to get started on one of the more thorny topics - kadhi's courts. The churches have made this one of the stickling issues to their opposition of the draft constitution, so I sought to read the clauses myself and see what all the noise was about.

At first glance the sections on Kadhi's courts in the current constitution (s.66) and draft constitution (s.169,170) appear similar.
  1. Both give parliament the power to determine how the Kadhi courts will be run
  2. Both make the courts subordinate courts. Subordinate courts means that their decisions can be appealed on and overturned by superior courts. 
  3. Another similarity is that both specifically state that these courts will deal only with matters of a personal nature, to people professing Islam.
I have noticed at least one difference. In the proposed constitution, in addition to professing Islam one is also required to submit to the jurisdiction of the court. I'm curious how this works, if I'm Muslim and I know I'm likely to come out on the losing end of a matter ending up in this court, can't I just say that I do not submit to the jurisdiction of the court? I guess the person bringing the claim would then have to go to the high court.


I've also picked out one more mention of Kadhi's courts in another sections in the proposed constitution, in section 24(4). This section limits the rights and freedoms of Muslims appearing under the Kadhi's courts, who might not enjoy the Bill of Rights in its absolute form.

The debate on Kadhi's courts has been expanded to one of equality of religions, so I went fishing for what the draft says about this. I did not find any section specifically giving all religions equality. What I found was sections 27(1) giving all persons equality, 27(4) and 27(5) preventing the discrimination of someone based on their religion, and 32 giving every person the right to freedom of religion and the preamble recognizing Kenya's cultural, ethnic and religious diversity.

Away from the legalese what does the inclusion of Kadhi's courts in the constitution mean to you in practical terms? How does it affect the sufurias of ugali on your table?
Labels:

Comments

Anonymous said…
As a non-Muslim, he Kadhi courts drama does not affect me, and It do not see the problem for non-Muslims. This is just jealously, the "Church" (don't even get me started on the hypocrisy of it all), is looking for more power. They want to "fight" to exclude the Muslims to get funding. Anything with madrasa, Islam, Muslims, in the west is seen as a threat, and the money spigot pours to remove that threat.

I am surprised the church hasn't started scream Al-Qaeda, this Al-Qaeda that.
May 04, 2010 4:39 AM
Harry Karanja said…
@anon. An interesting point of view, but I don't understand what you mean by Muslims not getting funding if the courts are excluded from the constitution.
May 04, 2010 7:34 AM
Anonymous said…
By funding I meant funding from the western, right wing "Christian" groups to the Kenyan "Church". The "fight against Islam" will generate donations.

The recent attempt in New York, has made many go hardline.

See comment 1046 in the New York Times (will require registration).

http://community.nytimes.com/comments/www.nytimes.com/2010/05/05/nyregion/05bomb.html#postComment


"I'd like to see it easier for our hard working neighbors to the south, a majority of which are Christians to legally emigrate to the US while making it harder for those in the Middle East to even step foot in America. Just my $0.02?"

To clarify, the "church" is looking at 2 things:
1. Money from the west
2. A seat at the political table.
May 04, 2010 11:41 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Young Entrepreneur Who Refused to Look for a Job

A read I thought would be of interest: LITTLE might be known about Imran Khosla, but not so for those who frequent courts or those in the information and communication technology industry. His is a story of a young entrepreneur who has refused to sit and just wait for jobs to come but has decided with the little cash he has to start off his own business that is now giving birth to new ventures beyond what he had imagined. Now in his late twenties, Imran set up his first electronic shop which also sold computer accessories in 2008. “After hearing lots of stories about graduates who have had tormenting search for jobs to no avail, obviously that was not the route I wished to take. I wanted to create my own job, and be my own boss, this was the inspiration that threw me into the world of entrepreneurship, and four years on, I tell you all is well and you cannot believe it I have over ten employees, and whose turnover is running into fortunes now,” Imran says with a cheer. His journ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sine qua non

Reader’s discretion: Strong Language and Violence Paxa  Rainne slams her open palm on the car horn frustrated. Another matatu has overlapped and cut her off just as she was to join the highway. Driving into town from Ngara is still a nightmare, despite a spanking new superhighway. Rainne wonders if her naivety in being polite to other road users is a magnet for this menace. Rainne has been in traffic now for over an hour and has hardly moved ten metres, giving way to dozens of other vehicles but not getting any reciprocation. She wriggles her bare toes, driving shoeless in these conditions is more comfortable.  She takes comfort in that small luxury. The lotion she applied on her feet earlier is keeping them nice and cool. The conductor of the matatu swings wildly from the door as it narrowly misses Rainne’s front bumper. “Siste, huku ni Nairobi, jikakamue”! She glares at him and he returns a lewd look, seemingly excited at the fact that he’s unnerved ...
Post a Comment
Read more

TO MENS REA OR NOT TO MENS REA

  Does excluding mens rea in the Statement of Offence make a charge defective? Rule of Law When a person is accused of an offence, his constitutional right to a fair hearing requires that he should be informed of the charge with sufficient detail to answer it [1] . In order for an accused person to be informed of the charge, first the charge is drawn up and secondly it is stated to him. Drawing the Charge A charge or information is drawn with sufficient detail to answer it if it contains:  a statement of the specific offence or offences with which the accused person is charged; and particulars necessary for giving reasonable information as to the nature of the offence charged [2] . The framing of a charge or information should follow the rules laid down in Section s137(a)(ii)the Criminal Procedure Code which provides: 137(a)(ii) the statement of offence shall describe the offence shortly in ordinary language, avoiding as far as possible the use of ...
Post a Comment
Read more