Skip to main content

Consitutional Anatomy - 001- Kadhi's Courts

Jumping straight into the fray, I want to get started on one of the more thorny topics - kadhi's courts. The churches have made this one of the stickling issues to their opposition of the draft constitution, so I sought to read the clauses myself and see what all the noise was about.

At first glance the sections on Kadhi's courts in the current constitution (s.66) and draft constitution (s.169,170) appear similar.
  1. Both give parliament the power to determine how the Kadhi courts will be run
  2. Both make the courts subordinate courts. Subordinate courts means that their decisions can be appealed on and overturned by superior courts. 
  3. Another similarity is that both specifically state that these courts will deal only with matters of a personal nature, to people professing Islam.
I have noticed at least one difference. In the proposed constitution, in addition to professing Islam one is also required to submit to the jurisdiction of the court. I'm curious how this works, if I'm Muslim and I know I'm likely to come out on the losing end of a matter ending up in this court, can't I just say that I do not submit to the jurisdiction of the court? I guess the person bringing the claim would then have to go to the high court.


I've also picked out one more mention of Kadhi's courts in another sections in the proposed constitution, in section 24(4). This section limits the rights and freedoms of Muslims appearing under the Kadhi's courts, who might not enjoy the Bill of Rights in its absolute form.

The debate on Kadhi's courts has been expanded to one of equality of religions, so I went fishing for what the draft says about this. I did not find any section specifically giving all religions equality. What I found was sections 27(1) giving all persons equality, 27(4) and 27(5) preventing the discrimination of someone based on their religion, and 32 giving every person the right to freedom of religion and the preamble recognizing Kenya's cultural, ethnic and religious diversity.

Away from the legalese what does the inclusion of Kadhi's courts in the constitution mean to you in practical terms? How does it affect the sufurias of ugali on your table?
Labels:

Comments

Anonymous said…
As a non-Muslim, he Kadhi courts drama does not affect me, and It do not see the problem for non-Muslims. This is just jealously, the "Church" (don't even get me started on the hypocrisy of it all), is looking for more power. They want to "fight" to exclude the Muslims to get funding. Anything with madrasa, Islam, Muslims, in the west is seen as a threat, and the money spigot pours to remove that threat.

I am surprised the church hasn't started scream Al-Qaeda, this Al-Qaeda that.
May 04, 2010 4:39 AM
Harry Karanja said…
@anon. An interesting point of view, but I don't understand what you mean by Muslims not getting funding if the courts are excluded from the constitution.
May 04, 2010 7:34 AM
Anonymous said…
By funding I meant funding from the western, right wing "Christian" groups to the Kenyan "Church". The "fight against Islam" will generate donations.

The recent attempt in New York, has made many go hardline.

See comment 1046 in the New York Times (will require registration).

http://community.nytimes.com/comments/www.nytimes.com/2010/05/05/nyregion/05bomb.html#postComment


"I'd like to see it easier for our hard working neighbors to the south, a majority of which are Christians to legally emigrate to the US while making it harder for those in the Middle East to even step foot in America. Just my $0.02?"

To clarify, the "church" is looking at 2 things:
1. Money from the west
2. A seat at the political table.
May 04, 2010 11:41 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Differences between a Business Name (Sole-Proprietorship / Partnership) and a Limited Liability Company

While consulting for our online company registration service, Incorporator I find myself answering the question "What is the difference between a sole-proprietorship and a company?" Anybody who is considering starting a business must consider what type of business structure is needed for his or her particular situation. In Kenya there are three types of structures that one can use to start their business. 1. An LLC, or Limited Liability Company 2. A sole proprietorship 3. A Partnership A Sole-proprietorship and a Partnership are registered through the same manner (Form BN/2) with the exception that a partnership has more than one owner and although not necessary, entrepreneurs are advised to register a partnership deed as well. In this article all references to sole-proprietorship also include partnership. Understanding the advantages and disadvantages of each structure is important when deciding which one you want to use for your company.
15 comments
Read more

Cyber Cafe with an EDGE

Followed up from Laying the Groundwork for a rural cyber I've finally got around to writing this. Thanks for you all who patiently waited. Although I approached the project as an "internet consultant", I soon realised I would need to implement the whole spectrum of tasks required to get the cyber running. I spent almost a week laying the structured cabling, installing the software, and configuring the network. Most of the work I was doing for the first time (e.g. drilling holes in concrete to fix the trunking screws) and most of it was hard, but all of it was enjoyable. I needed to prove the project was implementable with minimal human resources (if it was going to work elsewhere). With an eye on both troubleshooting by the owner and future projects I prepared detailed How To manuals for most of the tasks. So the day finally arrived, November 17th I connected all the PCs to the internet. The results were incredible, the speeds were nearly as good as my 256K broadband conn
36 comments
Read more

Selling stuff online to Kenyans

You might not know this but my love of entrepreneurship is fuelled majorly by my love of computer programming. My first exposure to computers was in 1988 when I played shuffleboard on an Atari. Having been raised in the boondocks I was utterly spellbound with the concept of a video game. In 'shags' we hardly ever got toys from the shops; instead we would create our own toys using locally available material. For toy cars we twisted and shaped wire coat hangers and cut out rubber tires from old (and sometimes mom's new) bathroom slippers. For planes, we stuck a stalk of grass through a dried maize leaf and made our 'propellers' rotate by holding them out in front and running into the wind (incidentally this was my all-time favourite). For marbles we hunted for used and discarded bottle-tops (beer bottle-tops were coveted). In fact we had so many toys that our game time never felt inadequate. That was until I discovered video games. Hard as I thought I didn't see
21 comments
Read more