Does excluding mens rea in the Statement of Offence make a charge defective?
Rule of Law
When a person is accused of an offence, his constitutional
right to a fair hearing requires that he should be informed of the charge with
sufficient detail to answer it[1]. In
order for an accused person to be informed of the charge, first the charge is
drawn up and secondly it is stated to him.
Drawing the Charge
A charge or information is drawn with sufficient detail to
answer it if it contains:
- a statement of the specific offence or
offences with which the accused person is charged; and
- particulars necessary for giving reasonable information as to the
nature of the offence charged[2].
The framing of a charge or information should follow the
rules laid down in Section s137(a)(ii)the Criminal Procedure Code which
provides:
137(a)(ii) the statement of offence shall describe the
offence shortly in ordinary language, avoiding as far as possible the use of
technical terms, and without necessarily
stating all the essential elements of the offence, and if the offence
charged is one created by enactment shall contain a reference to the section of
the enactment creating the offence; [emphasis mine]
Criminal law classically describes offences as being
composed of two elements: the mens rea
and the actus reus. The mens rea is the guilty mind and the actus reus is the guilty act[3].
Stating the Charge
The substance of the charge is stated to the accused person
in court and they are required to plead to this charge[4].
In stating the substance of the charge, the first step requires that all the essential ingredients of the
offence should be explained to the accused person in his language or in a
language he understands[5].
After the accused’s response is recorded and the accused person has admitted to
the offence, the prosecution will then state the facts.
Analysis
A charge is complete when it contains both the statement of
offence that discloses an offence in law and the essential elements of the
offence. The test for a defective charge sheet is a substantive one, not a
formalistic one[6]. It
will not matter whether the mens rea is captured in the statement of offence or
the particulars, as long as it is captured.
When framing the charge, the law provides for two separate
parts. The first part is only the statement of offence which is to be short and
reference the specific law creating the offence. The second part gives
particulars of the offence which would include the mens rea and the actus reus.
Before an accused person, can plead to an offence the
substance of the charge must be stated to him. The substance of the charge
includes both the statement of offence and the particulars of the offence. Only
then would the accused person have been informed of the charge with sufficient
detail to answer it.
Conclusion
The lack of mens rea in a statement of offence does not make
a charge defective. The charge will have been properly drafted as long as:
- the full charge
comprising both the statement of offence and particulars of the offence
contain both the actus reus and mens rea
- both the statement of offence and particulars of the offence are stated to the accused person before he is to take a plea.
Comments